Monday, July 15, 2019

We can infer certain stuff about femoids from their behavior

well, you know how when I was acting suicidal you psychoanalyzed to try to figure out, logically, what was really going on?

if we're gonna do that, we may as well also psychoanalyze the female, and figure out logically what it means if she acts like she wants to be degraded.

e.g. (1) she wants a guy who knows it's his role as the man to firmly take possession and ownership over her, and not put up with her emotional, self-destructive nonsense, or her refusals to cooperate that might destroy the family; she acknowledges him as superior due to his masculinity and therefore the proper one to have dominion, and she feels secure and happy in his acknowledging and taking this role; (2) she wants him to see her as a useful object, rather than as someone he's supposed to serve, which would make her a burden to him and therefore maybe someone who should be discarded as inconvenient; (3) she wants to be freed from all responsibilities other than the sexual and reproductive, so she can do what she does best, and his degrading her as worthless except for that stuff is an affirmation of that; (4) she wants to feel beneath him because the higher he is above her, the more her hypergamous desire for superior seed is satisfied; etc.

when the chick has daddy issues, she feels even more worthless because of how he treated her, and therefore it feels all the more right to her when she's degraded; and the objectification of her makes it feel like she's in her proper place

Thing is, there's more than one way to interpret behavior and psychoanalyze, because if we could look directly into the mind and see how it all works, we wouldn't need to psychoanalyze; we would just say, "we understand the brain and how it works"; we wouldn't need to infer; we could just say, "here's the source code; obviously it works this way." Since we don't have the source code, all we can do is reverse-engineer as best we can based on behavior and what it might mean.

Anyhoo — let's say we could confidently say we understand female psychology, and that this desire for degradation has the patriarchal implications we might presume it has. Then what? At that point we might as well arrange relations between the sexes to suit this reality.

There's also a corresponding male psychology; e.g. the man likes to have power over a woman and be served and worshipped by her, and he enjoys degrading her in certain ways. Or at least I do, I dunno about you

except my focus is more on the acceptance/validation/worship part, although degradation of her can go hand in hand with that, if the two are combined. she's acknowledging the man's value and showing love by being willing to degrade herself to please him

there are other inferences we can draw too, from women's behavior, by the way — for example, the fact that chicks don't regard marriage as a contract, except to the extent the dude is obligated by society to keep his end of the bargain

we can just infer from their behavior that they don't view men as equal partners in anything; either she's his bitch or he's her bitch, it's one or the other

there are no limitations on that; either she can treat him however she wants, or he can treat her however she wants; one of them is the other's property, to be used and disposed of at will, without any restrictions on that power; all contracts are null and void except to the extent some white knight or whatnot might come in and impose his own will on the situation; but that boils down to either some dude being a gullible chump, fighting for some silly feminist ideal (since she's just gonna surrender herself to the strongest man anyway, if given autonomy), or just trying to get in on another dude's game

that's why chicks will often turn against a white knight who tries to get in the way when a man is beating her; she actually prefers to get beaten than to have a white knight interfere with her man (re)claiming ownership of her

you wouldn't believe how much time and effort I pointlessly poured into telling chicks, "But you said you were gonna ... !" as though they were gonna feel morally bound by their promises

plus all the emotional energy, of feeling ripped off, when of course a chick is gonna feel entitled to rip off any man who isn't strong enough to subdue her bad behavior

she has no reputation of dishonesty to worry about, because she'll never need to deal with equals, as men might; her word is not important because all she's gonna do is submit to the most powerful man rather than try to strike a deal; or if she does need to strike a deal, she can just falsify the facts, because it can't be objectively proven, usually, that she's the one who broke her deal, unlike in say a commercial contract